Which probe is better.? Mach Discussion > General Mach Discussion Which probe is better.? (1/2) jevs: I am looking for a probe to do digitizing and also edge and center finding etc. Which of these is better or more accurate?
Peluqueria net solvermedia crack cocaine in america. Mujer caso vida real. Moda hombre primavera verano 2007 Chica latina desnuda gratis De chicas eroticas manga Site chica tanga culiando prive sex webcam Hoteles en les escaldes Compatibilidad de la mujer.
DeskCNC TP-100 Probe and Toolsetter. DeskCNC probe. DeskCNC Tool Setter. IMService is a master distributor of DeskCNC. We are seeking oem's and dealers. Both a Contact Probe and a Tool Setter. Probe is 5 way triggered and has a long-wearing.079' (2 mm) diameter, ruby tip. DeskCNC Software Only US$250.00 FREE SHIPPING (USA main land). Touch Probe with 3/8” Shank Stainless Steel touch probe built to last, with.
Or should I be looking for something better? If so what would it be? Hood: Check out Zarzuls probe, you will find the thread in the bargain basement section of the forum. Hood jevs: I beleive his probe is the first one I linked to at Wildhorse? I read all those posts, but I still don't know which of the two is better. One is nearly 3 times as expensive, but is it better (more accurate or better repeatability)?
Also are these probes even any good for edge finding, or are they not accurate enough? Hood: I made my own probe and its very accurate, it is along the same lines as the ones you linked to, ie the 3 rod and ball type.
I dont use it for probing and it was never my intention to use it for that, it was made for edge finding and is extremely repeatable, I have it true to less than 0.005mm and it will repeat at less than I can measure. So from that I would say there is no reason to think either of the two above would be any different. Hood BR549: I have used the IMSRV model for over 5 years without fail and it is VERY accurate. (;-) TP Navigation [0] [#].